DAVID MANZUR once wrote...
It's been a long time since I saw, for the first time, Lorenza's work and I felt curious because of the chromatic and lighting effects she expresses with.
I didn't have, in that moment, the chance to go deeper into the analysis of a production in which the visual effects touched me in a so profound way.
At the first glance y set her work in which might be an abstract expression not separated from convencional elements, (flowers, submarine landscapes, birds and everyting that one stores in one's own memories, but faint throughout time).
But as time passed by, I got closer to the artist with the curiosity of a mere spectator, who would like to find what words can't explain... and, how it had to be expected, her words talked to me about her task, but not about her concept, of that concept, she didn't have words for that because those concepts were painted. Painted? Painted is not the correct explanation for the process Lorenza uses to resolve her pictures... Photographs? Neither. So, What the hell was behind those lightning effects that were touching me?
It was just then when her words helped me understanding a job related to the physics and the chemistry world not being separated from photography elements, but without the traditional resources of cameras and the process taken in a formal laboratory.
